Skip to main content
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Our Vision
    • Our Vision Overview
    • Why Health Equity
    • Focus Areas
    • Measuring RWJF Progress
  • Grants
    • Grants Overview
    • Active Funding Opportunities
    • Awarded Grants
    • Grantee Stories
    • Grant Process
    • Grantee Resources
  • Insights
    • Insights Overview
    • Blog
    • Our Research
    • Advocacy And Policy
  • About RWJF
    • About RWJF Overview
    • Our Guiding Principles
    • How We Work
    • Impact Investments
    • Staff And Trustees
    • Press Room
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility Statement
Find A Grant
Global Search Dialog
    Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
    • Our Vision
      • Our Vision Overview
      • Why Health Equity
      • Focus Areas
      • Measuring RWJF Progress
    • Grants
      • Grants Overview
      • Active Funding Opportunities
      • Awarded Grants
      • Grantee Stories
      • Grant Process
      • Grantee Resources
    • Insights
      • Insights Overview
      • Blog
      • Our Research
      • Advocacy And Policy
    • About RWJF
      • About RWJF Overview
      • Our Guiding Principles
      • How We Work
      • Impact Investments
      • Staff And Trustees
      • Press Room
      • Careers
      • Contact Us
      • Accessibility Statement
    Find A Grant
    Global Search Dialog

      Marketplace Pulse: Work Requirements in Medicaid and Behavioral Healthcare

      Brief May-18-2023 | 5-min read
      1. Insights
      2. Our Research
      3. Marketplace Pulse: Work Requirements in Medicaid and Behavioral Healthcare
      RWJF Staff Profile
      Kathy Hempstead / RWJF

      Katherine Hempstead

      RWJF Senior Policy Adviser
      Learn more about Katherine

      The Marketplace Pulse series provides expert insights on timely policy topics related to the health insurance marketplaces. The series, authored by RWJF Senior Policy Adviser Katherine Hempstead, analyzes changes in the individual market; shifting carrier trends; nationwide insurance data; and more to help states, researchers, and policymakers better understand the pulse of the marketplace.

      A bill which was recently passed in the U.S. House of Representatives proposes adding work requirements to the Medicaid program. This old, re-run concept has been roundly rejected on a number of fronts, both on principle and because the practical application of the policy would lead to large coverage losses and a huge cost-shift to the states. This would increase the number of uninsured and would have particularly negative implications for behavioral healthcare.

      On principle, critics claim that work requirements are inconsistent with Medicaid’s purpose, which is to improve health. Imposing a policy that would inevitably lead to millions of people in America losing health coverage would substantially undermine that goal.

      Research also shows that work requirements do not work in practice. If studies of prior attempts are any guide, work requirements will not lead to the increase in employment that supporters predict, largely because the vast majority of enrollees (about 91% in the case of Medicaid) are already working or cannot work due to caregiving responsibilities or health problems. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently estimated that work requirements will not lead to increased employment but would cause a substantial loss of Medicaid enrollment.

      The difficulty in complying with reporting requirements would lead to a substantial loss of coverage, even among many who are working or who might be able to qualify for an exemption. The catastrophic impact of the administrative process on coverage is what some have called the "blithe cruelty" of work requirements. Studies of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the brief experience in Arkansas with Medicaid work requirements point to the magnitude of this problem. In Arkansas, one in four of those who had to comply with work requirements lost their coverage.

      Coverage loss is disastrous for individuals and also consequential for states, who would stand to lose a significant amount of federal funding as enrollment drops. States would be forced to decide whether to make up the loss with their own dollars or face the consequences of increased uninsurance. The $109 billion in reduced federal spending that CBO projects from work requirements would be paid for, one way or another, by states.  

      These concerns become even more salient when considering the potential impact on those who rely on Medicaid for treatment of behavioral health conditions. This is a sizable population with a considerable need for services. Roughly 40% of non-elderly adults in Medicaid have either a mental illness or a substance use disorder (SUD), and approximately 11% have both diagnoses. The prevalence of behavioral health issues is higher among Medicaid enrollees than in the general population. For example, while roughly 18% of all non-elderly adults are covered by Medicaid, 26% of those with a serious mental illness (SMI) are enrolled in the program, as are 23% of those with a mental illness and 21% of those with a substance use disorder. Medicaid is the nation’s largest provider of behavioral health services, particularly for those with more serious conditions. In 2020, there were nearly 15 million Medicaid beneficiaries who were diagnosed with either a mental illness or a SUD, a number which has surely grown.

      This population is at a heightened risk of bad outcomes from work requirements. Behavioral health conditions make it inherently difficult to work, since they often affect reasoning, mood, and cognition. While some enrollees may qualify for disability status, many will not, and will consequently lose their coverage—and with it the ability to manage their health. Those affected could include, for example, young adults just beginning treatment for a substance use disorder, or people experiencing early symptoms of a serious mental illness.  

      Recognizing how negatively work requirements would impact people experiencing mental illness, some might propose the design of an exemption process for these populations. But the practical realities make this a fool’s errand. The same factors that complicate employment for many individuals affected by behavioral health conditions would make it harder to meet the administrative burdens imposed by work requirements. This could result in loss of coverage due to failure to provide the appropriate documentation, even for those who may be working. Some individuals with serious mental illness or substance use disorder will not be able to navigate the system in order to apply for an exemption, even though they would qualify. Because of the impact of their conditions, one study warns, “Many people impaired by mental or substance use disorders will surely exit the Medicaid program because of incomplete paperwork or for not reporting on changing circumstances.”  

      Loss of coverage would be disastrous for people in treatment for mental health or substance use issues. Consistent access to healthcare services and medication is critical to the management of symptoms such as opioid dependency or psychosis. This access is especially important to support employment for those enrollees who are able to work. Paradoxically, work requirements would almost certainly reduce employment among Medicaid recipients with behavioral health conditions.

      Imposing work requirements on people with mental illnesses and substance use disorders would have negative health and employment impacts on individuals. It would also be fiscally consequential for states, who would potentially be on the hook for treatment costs, as well as the indirect costs of untreated substance use and mental health conditions, such as unstable housing and inability to complete education or participate in the labor force. The costs associated with mental health and substance abuse treatment motivated many states to expand Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act. States would have to make up billions of lost federal dollars or accept the consequences of large increases in the population with untreated mental health and substance use disorders.

      This grim scenario comes at a time when the nation is already in the throes of a behavioral health crisis. Policymakers of both parties and at every level of government have repeatedly called to increase access to treatment. Medicaid is the largest payor for mental health and addiction services, covering hospital and crisis care, peer support, medication, and case management. Imposing work requirements will separate people from needed services and impose billions of dollars of costs on states. The biggest price would be paid by the millions who rely on Medicaid for treatment, for whom losing access to care will jeopardize their path to recovery. The potential for that outcome illustrates why work requirements in Medicaid are wrong in principle as well as in practice.

      Related Content

      Library
      A nurse takes the blood pressure of a woman at a table.

      Marketplace Pulse

      A series authored by RWJF Senior Policy Adviser Katherine Hempstead provides expert insights on timely policy topics related to the health insurance marketplaces.

      1-min read

      RWJF Research
      Work requirements graphic.

      Work Requirements: What Are They? Do They Work?

      Work requirements do not lift people out of poverty, yet there is evidence that supports alternative programs and strategies to help people get the assistance that they need.

      Subscribe to receive Funding Alerts & more

      Explore the latest in reflection and research from subject matter experts at RWJF and our wide network of partners.

      Email address already subscribed. Please check your inbox to manage your subscriptions.

      Subscribed!

      Thank you. You are now subscribed.

      Tell us what type of content you want to receive.

      Be informed with our twice a month newsletter updating you with relevant news and research around a Culture of Health, as well as the latest funding opportunities.

      Get funded by RWJF: Receive notifications when new funding opportunities are released.

      Receive monthly updates on RWJF-sponsored research that informs many robust health policy debates on Capitol Hill, covering topics like health equity, improving access to quality healthcare, equitable housing, and more.

      Shop talk for researchers. This monthly newsletter covers research news and opportunities from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

      Communications expedite action. Get periodic research and expert insights on the best ways to communicate so we can spread what works.

      Sometimes we have news, announcements or opportunities that don't quite fit the subscription parameters above. If you're interested, we'll send you this information under "There's more...". *If you've indicated you are an EU resident, we will only send these communications if you intentionally check this box.

      Which profession or pursuit best describes you?

      Area(s) Of Interest

      Unsubscribe

      Stop receiving all emails from RWJF

      This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
      • CONTACT RWJF

        50 College Road East
        Princeton, NJ 08540-6614

         

        US Toll Free: (877) 843-7953

        International: +1 (609) 627-6000

      • MANAGE YOUR GRANTS

        MyRWJF Login

        • Facebook
        • LinkedIn
        • YouTube
        • Instagram

      • Our Vision
        • Our Vision Overview
        • Why Health Equity
        • Focus Areas
        • Measuring RWJF Progress
      • Grants
        • Grants Overview
        • Active Funding Opportunities
        • Awarded Grants
        • Grantee Stories
        • Grant Process
        • Grantee Resources
      • Insights
        • Insights Overview
        • Blog
        • Our Research
        • Advocacy And Policy
      • About RWJF
        • About RWJF Overview
        • Our Guiding Principles
        • How We Work
        • Impact Investments
        • Staff And Trustees
        • Press Room
        • Careers
        • Contact Us
        • Accessibility Statement

      ©2001- 

      Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. All Rights Reserved. 

       

      • Manage Email
      • Privacy Statement
      • Terms and Conditions